Save the Sacred Headwaters by Wade Davis

In a rugged knot of mountains in the remote reaches of northern British Columbia lies a stunningly beautiful valley known to the First Nations as the Sacred Headwaters. There, on the southern edge of the Spatsizi Wilderness, the Serengeti of Canada, are born in remarkably close proximity three of Canada’s most important salmon rivers, the Stikine, Skeena and the Nass. In a long day, perhaps two, it is possible to walk through open meadows, following the tracks of grizzly, caribou and wolf, and drink from the very sources of the three rivers that inspired so many of the great cultures of the Pacific Northwest, the Gitxsan and Wet’sutwet’en, the Carrier and Sekani, the Tsimshian, Nisga’a, Tahltan, Haisla and Tlinglit.

The only other place I know where such a wonder of geography occurs is in Tibet, where from the base of Mount Kailas arise three of the great rivers of Asia, the Indus, Ganges and Brahmaputra, vital arteries that bring life to more than a billion people downstream. Revered by Hindu, Buddhist and Jain, Kailas is considered so sacred that no one is allowed to walk upon its slopes, let alone climb to its summit. The thought of violating its flanks with industrial development would represent for all peoples of Asia an act of desecration beyond all imaginings. Anyone who would even dare propose such a deed would face the most severe of sanctions, in both this world and the next.

In Canada, we treat the land quite differently. Against the wishes of all First Nations, the government of British Columbia has opened the Sacred Headwaters to industrial development. These are not trivial initiatives. Imperial Metals proposes an open pit copper and gold mine processing 30,000 tons of ore a day from the flank of Todagin Mountain, home to the largest population of Stone Sheep in the world. Its tailings pond, if constructed, would drain directly into the headwater lake chain of the Iskut River, the principle tributary of the Stikine. Over its lifetime of 25 years, the mine would generate 183 million tons of toxic tailings and 307 million tons of waste rock, which would need to be treated for acid mine drainage for over 200 years. Fortune Minerals and Westhawk Coal would tear into the headwater valley itself, on a similar scale, with open pit anthracite coal operations that would level entire mountains.

The largest project is a proposal by Royal Dutch Shell to extract coal bed methane gas from the same anthracite deposit, across an enormous tenure of close to a million acres. Should this project go ahead it would imply a network of several thousand wells, linked by roads and pipelines, laid upon the landscape of the entire Sacred Headwaters basin. CBM recovery is by all accounts a highly invasive process. To free the methane from the anthracite, technicians must fracture the coal seams with massive injections of chemical agents under high pressure, as much as 350,000 gallons at a shot, a technique that in some deposits liberates enormous volumes of highly toxic water. More than 900 different chemicals, many of them powerful carcinogens, are registered for use, but for proprietary reasons companies do not have to disclose the identity of the solutions employed at any given site.

Environmental concerns aside, think for a moment of what these proposals imply about our culture. I recall overhearing a conversation some seasons ago at a neighbouring lodge between an assistant deputy minister of mines and an engineer from Imperial Metals. They had just come down by helicopter from the site and they could not stop speaking about how beautiful it was, how many sheep they had seen, how extraordinary the vistas from the height of the mountain. They both said that they had never seen such a beautiful place in their lives. As it turned out, it was the first time either of them had come so far north. They had never ventured beyond the Yellowhead Highway and here they were in a land they had never known, stunned by the beauty of a mountain it was their corporate and bureaucratic mission to destroy.

This was a powerful lesson for me, which I raised when I met some months later with Premier Campbell in Vancouver. I was amazed to learn at that meeting that he too had never seen the Stikine. The Premier of British Columbia, the elected representative of all the people, had never visited a region encompassing fully a quarter of the province he presumed to govern. That a head of government would authorize a major industrial initiative of such consequence, without having ever visited the region to be so irrevocably impacted was rather startling.

I suspect that few of the principles of Imperial Metals ever saw this country, until they began to set in motion their plans to transform it for their own personal gain. I understand this, as it is their business to do so. But I was astonished to learn from their proposal that their project is not economically viable unless the Canadian people subsidize it through the construction of power lines. That these tax dollars will be drawn from a fund conceived to stimulate “green” enterprise and the transformation of the carbon economy represents a level of political cynicism that I have never before witnessed in the affairs of a major industrialized nation state.

We accept it as normal that people who have never been on the land, who have no history or connection to the country, may legally secure the right to come in and by the very nature of their enterprises leave in their wake a cultural and physical landscape utterly transformed and desecrated. What’s more, in granting such mining concessions, often initially for trivial sums to speculators from distant cities, companies cobbled together with less history than my dog, the government places no cultural or market value on the land itself. The cost of destroying a natural asset, or its inherent worth if left intact, has no metric in the economic calculations that support the industrialization of the wild. No company has to compensate the public for what it does to the commons, the forests, mountains and rivers, which by definition belong to everyone. It merely requires permission to proceed. This is very odd, if you think about it, and surely reflects a mindset that ought no longer to have a place in a world in which wild lands are becoming increasingly rare and valuable, even as we strive as a species to live in a sustainable manner on a planet we have come to recognize as being resilient but not inviolable.

The people of the Sacred Headwaters, the men and women of the Iskut First Nation who have rallied against these developments, have a very different way of thinking about the land. For them the Sacred Headwaters is a neighborhood, at once their grocery store and sanctuary, their church and schoolyard, their cemetery and country club. They believe that the people with greatest claim to ownership of the valley are the generations as yet unborn. The Sacred Headwaters will be their nursery. The Iskut elders, almost all of who grew up on the land, have formally called for the end of all industrial activity in the valley and the creation of a Sacred Headwaters Tribal Heritage Area.

Since the summer of 2005 Iskut men, women and children, together with Tahltan supporters from Telegraph Creek and beyond, have maintained in all seasons an educational camp at the head of the only road access to the Sacred Headwaters. Those who would violate the land they hold in trust have been denied entry. Those who accept and revere the land as it is have been welcomed. With everyone they have shared their vision of a new era of sustainable stewardship both for their homeland and the entire northwest quadrant of the province.

In the end, what is at stake is the future of one of the most extraordinary regions in all of North America. The fate of the Sacred Headwaters transcends the interests of local residents, provincial agencies, mining companies and those few among the First Nations who favour industrial development at any cost. The voices of all Canadians deserve to be heard. Premier Gordon Campbell to his immense credit has attached his legacy to the fight against global warming, boldly calling for a 33% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. What better way to celebrate such a profound and courageous act of leadership than to say to Royal Dutch Shell that no amount of methane gas can compensate for the sacrifice of a place that can be the Sacred Headwaters of all Canadians.

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: , , ,

7 Responses to “Save the Sacred Headwaters by Wade Davis”

  1. Stephen Brown March 17, 2011 at 3:35 am #

    Your story strikes a chord in my heart and I wish you and your people success in your endeavors to protect and keep the land from profit driven corporations. The shadowy agendas of multinational corporations to tap every single gigajoule of stored carbon-based energy on the planet must be stopped. There is no equity in a toxified environment. Developments such as this destroy community and polarize the resultant rich and poor.Your plans for the use of the area is beneficial to community, and I dream to see you there someday.

  2. Kristian Olauson April 2, 2011 at 8:21 am #

    Thank you Wade. Your wisdom and clarity regarding this threat is an immediate call to action. Is a documentary being created? It would be great to host an evening at our local theatre to draw attention and support the effort to stop Shell.

  3. Sandy Clements December 16, 2011 at 3:22 pm #

    Years ago I had the opportunity to get married and live in Rome, Italy. Before making my decision I took the Gondola up the mountain in Banff. Looking out over the mountains I knew I could never leave Canada permanently. There is an old joke in academia that the pursuit of national identity is Canada’s national identity. I thought on that day that it is the land that Canadians love and that make them feel unique. It still is to me. Living in Alberta within 40 minutes of wilderness I am blessed. Living in Alberta with the massive oil industry that has had to be forced every step of the way to treat the land well has made me suspicious of all resource development. The Tar Sands is only one of many death bringers to the land and the animals. We are in the hands of governments and corporations. We need to stop thinking of more and more development as a good thing. Few of these companies are Canadian so the profit leaves the country. Royalties are very low, corporate taxes are low, and the executive level are paying little in personal tax. Why are we giving away our heritage, the lands our ancestors loved and took care of? Greed. Full stop. Greed for more than is necessary to live well.

  4. Kelly January 10, 2012 at 10:53 pm #

    What can I do to help stop this critically disasterous exploitaion of our land?

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Water and culture « Triple A Learning IB Blogs - March 21, 2011

    [...] them through industrial development. You can read more about Davis’ thoughts on this issue in his blog post from earlier this [...]

  2. Better World | Pearltrees - March 17, 2012

    [...] Save the Sacred Headwaters by Wade Davis | Our Living Water Revered by Hindu, Buddhist and Jain, Kailas is considered so sacred that no one is allowed to walk upon its slopes, let alone climb to its summit. The thought of violating its flanks with industrial development would represent for all peoples of Asia an act of desecration beyond all imaginings. Anyone who would even dare propose such a deed would face the most severe of sanctions, in both this world and the next. [...]

  3. Not Jack (notjack) | Pearltrees - March 18, 2012

    [...] This was a powerful lesson for me, which I raised when I met some months later with Premier Campbell in Vancouver. Save the Sacred Headwaters by Wade Davis | Our Living Water [...]

Leave a Reply


[Read our comments policy here.We reserve the right to remove comments that are inappropriate.]